Tag: Government Reform

  • Department of Technology: Democracy’s Last Stand in the AI Age

    You didn’t vote for the algorithm that denied your job application. You didn’t vote for the one that decided your insurance claim wasn’t worth reviewing. And yet, these systems govern your life.

    In the age of AI, power flows to those who write the code, not those who cast the votes. This silent shift is affecting everything from your job to global stability.

    Our centralized technology systems create cascading vulnerabilities that leave communities defenseless when infrastructure fails.

    Book Two,

    Building Resilient Democracy, explores what happens when those systems fail, showing how communities with democratic technology governance not only survive disasters, but emerge stronger.

    Meanwhile, AI is transforming the labor market, displacing millions and destabilizing communities.

    Book Three,

    The Future of Work, the Future of Democracy, shows how a single email can eliminate hundreds of jobs, creating a ripple effect that devastates neighborhoods.

    The stakes are even higher in Book Four, AGI and the Future of Nations. The document warns that a single nation could seize permanent control over the economic, military, and informational foundations of global civilization.

    But this isn’t a book of fear. It is a book of possibility. This four-book series is a blueprint for a different future. It proposes a democratic framework to ensure that technology serves everyone, not just a privileged few.

    You’ll discover a path to:

    • Democratic Control: A new kind of public institution—elected, accountable, and technically competent—that can govern the systems already governing us, from local Technology Commissioners to a federal Secretary of Technology11.
    • Community Resilience: How communities can democratize technology before a crisis hits and emerge stronger than ever12.
    • Shared Prosperity: How to ensure that the benefits of automation flow not only to shareholders but to every citizen, with dignified pathways for earning a living in an AI-driven economy13131313.
    • Global Cooperation: A blueprint for how the great powers can choose cooperation over domination, allowing AGI to strengthen democracy by distributing its benefits and constraining its risks14.

    We don’t need to fear the future. We need to elect it.

    Download the full four-book series now to explore these groundbreaking ideas and join the movement to build a democracy strong enough to govern the future.

    Bonus Book Five: Department of Technology Book Five:
    The Golden Age of Cooperation

    • Department of Technology Book One: Democracy’s Last Stand in the AI Age
    Department of Technology Book One_ Democracy’s Last Stand in the AI AgeDownload
    • Department of Technology Book Two: Building Resilient Democracy
    Department of Technology Book Two_ Building Resilient DemocracyDownload
    • Department of Technology Book Three: The Future of Work, the Future of Democracy
    Department of Technology Book Three_ The Future of Work, the Future of DemocracyDownload
    • Department of Technology, Book Four: AGI and the Future of Nations
    Department of Technology, Book Four_ AGI and the Future of NationsDownload

    Department of Technology Book Five: The Golden Age of Cooperation

    Department of Technology Book Five_ The Golden Age of CooperationDownload

  • Why America Needs a Department of Technology—Now More Than Ever!

    Technology is transforming every aspect of our lives, from how we work and learn to how we communicate and innovate. Yet, the United States lacks a centralized federal agency dedicated to shaping and governing this rapid technological evolution. The urgency of establishing a Department of Technology as proposed here at www.department.technology, has never been greater.

    What is the Department of Technology?

    Our proposed Department of Technology would serve as the U.S. government’s hub for tech policy, ensuring that:

    • Regulations foster innovation rather than stifle it.
    • AI, cybersecurity, and emerging tech are handled with strategic foresight.
    • Education, business, and governance are equipped with the best digital tools.
    • The U.S. leads global discussions on ethical and responsible AI.

    The department would be led by a Secretary of Technology, appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate, who would advocate for smart policies balancing innovation and regulation.

    Why the Paris AI Summit Mattered

    In February 2025, world leaders gathered at the Artificial Intelligence Action Summit in Paris to shape the future of AI governance. However, the U.S. and U.K. chose not to sign the summit’s declaration. Why? To avoid excessive regulation that could hinder AI development. While this concern is valid, simply declining to sign was not enough. Sixty countries signed the declaration (China, India, France, etc.). The U.S. should have presented a compelling alternative framework—one that supports both innovation and global trust.

    A Secretary of Technology could have played a pivotal role at the summit by:

    • Championing a U.S.-led AI governance model that protects technological progress while ensuring ethical use.
    • Shaping policies that maintain U.S. regulatory flexibility while addressing global AI challenges.
    • Building alliances to prevent AI monopolization by a few major powers.

    The Cost of Inaction

    Without our proposed Department of Technology:

    • Other nations will dictate global AI and tech policies without U.S. leadership.
    • American businesses may face regulatory fragmentation, limiting their global competitiveness.
    • Cybersecurity threats and misinformation risks will grow without a coordinated strategy.

    A Path Forward

    Creating a Department of Technology is not just necessary—it is inevitable. To move forward:

    1. Engage with lawmakers—urge them to support the Department of Technology proposal.
    2. Develop a clear U.S. AI and tech policy strategy that aligns innovation with governance.
    3. Prepare for future global summits where the U.S. can lead discussions, not follow them.

    America Must Lead

    Technology is the foundation of modern progress, and the U.S. must take an active role in shaping its future. A Department of Technology would provide the leadership needed to ensure that innovation thrives while global trust in technology governance is strengthened.

    The time to act is now. Let’s establish the Department of Technology and secure America’s role as the leader in the digital age.

    085eb85e11b563e0f0ee1c23cb9552a9cc8f1e83Download

  • Establishing a Department of Technology: Balancing Innovation with Accountability

    In our rapidly evolving digital age, technology has become the backbone of society, influencing every aspect of our lives. To harness its potential while safeguarding public interests, we propose the establishment of a Department of Technology (DoT) at all levels of government—federal, state, county, and local. This department would serve as a centralized body to manage and innovate technology initiatives, ensuring they align with public needs and remain competitive on a global scale.

    The Dual Mandate: Innovation and Accountability

    Our Department of Technology primary mission would be twofold:

    1. Drive Technological Innovation: Develop, implement, and oversee forward-thinking technology policies that serve the public good.
    2. Ensure Robust Accountability: Maintain transparency and ethical standards through a comprehensive system of checks and balances.

    Key Oversight Mechanisms

    To achieve this balance, we propose the following oversight structures:

    1. Leadership Accountability

    • Implement term limits for elected technology officials
    • Conduct annual performance evaluations by an independent body

    2. Oversight Committees

    • Establish a Technology Oversight Committee (TOC) with diverse stakeholders
    • Create an Ethics Committee to address conflicts of interest

    3. Transparency Initiatives

    • Launch open data initiatives to publish performance metrics and budgets
    • Hold regular public hearings for community feedback

    4. Regular Audits and Assessments

    • Conduct independent financial and compliance audits
    • Perform impact assessments on all major technology initiatives

    5. Stakeholder Engagement

    • Form advisory boards with community, industry, and academic representatives
    • Implement public feedback platforms for ongoing citizen input

    6. Cross-Department Collaboration

    • Create cross-agency teams to foster collaboration
    • Develop a coordinated, government-wide technology strategy

    7. Whistleblower Protections

    • Implement secure, anonymous reporting systems
    • Provide support programs for whistleblowers

    8. Legislative Oversight

    • Require regular reporting to legislative bodies
    • Establish legislative review processes for significant initiatives

    9. Legal and Regulatory Framework

    • Develop clear legal guidelines for department operations
    • Conduct periodic reviews of relevant laws and regulations

    10. Performance Metrics

    • Establish key performance indicators (KPIs) for technology initiatives
    • Regularly review and adapt strategies based on KPI assessments

    A Vision for the Future

    By establishing a Department of Technology with these robust oversight mechanisms, we can create a technological landscape that is not only innovative and efficient but also transparent, ethical, and responsive to public needs. This structure will enable us to:

    • Harness technology’s potential for public benefit
    • Ensure responsible and accountable governance of technology initiatives
    • Foster innovation while maintaining ethical standards
    • Create a more equitable and prosperous digital society

    As we embrace the technological future, let us do so with a commitment to both progress and accountability. The proposed Department of Technology, guided by these principles, can lead the way in shaping a technological ecosystem that truly serves and empowers all citizens.

  • Our Technology Democracy Revolution: Why America Needs Elected Tech Leaders Now

    In an era where technology shapes every aspect of our lives, from the smartphones in our pockets to the algorithms determining our news feeds, America faces a critical crossroads. We’re sprinting into a digital future, but our government’s oversight of technology remains stuck in the analog age. It’s time for a radical shift: we need elected technology leaders for a dedicated department of technology at the state, county, and local levels, and we needed them yesterday.

    The Transparency Crisis

    Imagine a world where every tax dollar spent, every government contract awarded, and every policy decision made is instantly visible to the public. This isn’t a utopian fantasy—it’s a technological reality waiting to be implemented. But who will champion this cause? Certainly not appointed bureaucrats comfortable in their unaccountable positions.

    Enter the elected technology leader: a digital sentinel answering directly to you, the voter. These tech-savvy officials would be your eyes and ears in the labyrinth of government agencies, ensuring that technology serves the people, not hidden agendas.

    Every state, county, and municipality would have their own department of technology, headed by a tech leader, voted in by the voters. Just like we have an elected attorney general at the state level, and elected district attorneys for the county and local levels. Creating checks and balances on each other and other government agencies, politicians, and government employees.

    From Blockchain to Boardrooms: A Tech Revolution in Governance

    Picture this: blockchain technology tracking political donations in real-time, AI systems flagging potential fraud in government spending, and user-friendly portals allowing you to trace the journey of your tax dollars from your wallet to their final destination. These aren’t futuristic concepts—they’re tools we can implement today, tools that elected tech leaders would be mandated to deploy across all levels of government.

    But the impact goes beyond just cool tech. An elected Secretary of Technology at state, county, and municipal levels would be the public’s advocate in the technology age of AI, robotics, and Internet of Things. They’d ensure that the AI deciding your loan application isn’t biased, that the smart traffic lights in your city actually reduce congestion, and that your personal data isn’t being sold to the highest bidder.

    The Ethics Imperative

    As AI and data-driven systems increasingly steer public policy, who’s making sure these digital decision-makers aren’t harboring the biases of their human creators? Elected tech leaders would stand guard, auditing algorithms, enforcing privacy rights, and ensuring that the march of progress doesn’t trample individual liberties.

    This isn’t just about preventing dystopian scenarios—it’s about actively shaping a future where technology amplifies democratic values rather than undermining them.

    A Call to Tech Arms

    The creation of a federal Department of Technology, as proposed by me at the Department of Technology located online at www.department.technology, is a crucial step. But it’s not enough. We need a network of elected tech leaders forming a technology web of accountability across every level of government.

    These aren’t just administrative positions—they’re the frontline defenders of democracy in the digital age. They’re the key to ensuring that as America innovates, it doesn’t leave its core values behind.

    The question isn’t whether we can afford to create these positions. The real question is: can we afford not to? In an age where lines of code can impact lives as much as lines of legislation, having tech-savvy, accountable leaders isn’t a luxury—it’s a necessity.

    Our shared peace and prosperity future is technological, and our democracy must evolve to meet it. Elected technology leaders are more than just a good idea—they’re our best hope for a transparent, accountable, and truly modern government. The time to act is now. Our technology democracy depends on it.

    Visit our Department of Technology at www.department.technology to learn more!

  • Why America Needs a Federal Department of Technology

    In the rapidly evolving landscape of the 21st century, technology is not just a sector—it’s the backbone of our economy, the driver of innovation, and a critical component of national security. Despite its importance, the United States currently lacks a unified federal approach to managing technology. Various agencies handle different aspects of our technological infrastructure, leading to inefficiencies and missed opportunities.

    It’s time to advocate for a single, dedicated Department of Technology at the federal level to ensure a cohesive, strategic, and forward-thinking approach to our nation’s tech landscape.

    The Current Fragmented Approach

    Currently, multiple federal entities oversee different facets of technology:

    • The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (https://www.nist.gov) develops standards and metrics.
    • The United States Digital Service (USDS) (https://www.usds.gov) works on improving government digital services.
    • The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) (https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp) advises on technology policy. Established by United States Congress on May 11, 1976, with a broad mandate to advise the President on the effects of science and technology on domestic and international affairs.
    • The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (https://www.fcc.gov) regulates communications.
    • The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) (https://www.cisa.gov) protects critical infrastructure.
    • The General Services Administration (GSA) (https://www.gsa.gov), through its Technology Transformation Services (TTS), helps agencies with technology acquisition and development.
    • The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) (https://www.ntia.doc.gov) advises on telecommunications policy.

    Each of these agencies plays a vital role, but the lack of coordination leads to redundancy, gaps in policy, and a slower response to technological advancements and cybersecurity threats. To further complicate the bureaucratic process there are many more sub-agencies and councils (National Science and Technology Council, General Services Administration’s Federal IT Dashboard , etc.) that are too numerous to list here.

    The Vision for a Department of Technology

    A single Department of Technology would unify these disparate functions under one roof, providing a coordinated and efficient approach to managing the nation’s technological resources. Here’s how this department could transform America’s tech landscape:

    1. Enhanced National Security

    In today’s digital age, cybersecurity is national security. A unified Department of Technology would streamline efforts to protect our critical infrastructure, develop robust cybersecurity policies, and respond more swiftly to threats. Centralized command and control would enhance our ability to safeguard against cyberattacks, ensuring a resilient and secure nation.

    2. Streamlined Innovation and Standards

    Innovation thrives in environments with clear standards and guidance. By consolidating the functions of agencies like NIST and NTIA, the Department of Technology could establish more cohesive and comprehensive standards for emerging technologies, fostering innovation while ensuring safety and interoperability.

    3. Improved Government Digital Services

    A centralized approach would enable the federal government to provide better, more efficient digital services to its citizens. By integrating the efforts of the USDS and GSA’s TTS, the Department of Technology could drive the modernization of government IT systems, making them more user-friendly, secure, and effective.

    4. Transparent and Accountable Governance

    A single department would enhance transparency and accountability in technology governance. It would provide a clear point of contact for the public and private sectors, ensuring that technological policies and decisions are made with greater oversight and public input.

    5. Competitive Edge in the Global Economy

    To remain a global leader, the United States must stay at the forefront of technological innovation. A unified Department of Technology would ensure that our policies and investments are strategically aligned to foster growth in key areas such as artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and 5G networks, keeping America competitive on the world stage.

    Summary

    The creation of a Federal Department of Technology is not just a bureaucratic reshuffling—it’s a necessary evolution to meet the demands of our time. It’s about ensuring that our nation can effectively manage the technologies that underpin our economy, security, and daily lives.

    We need to advocate for this change. We need to raise our voices to our representatives and push for legislation that consolidates our technology efforts under one roof. By doing so, we will create a future where technology serves the public good more effectively, drives innovation more efficiently, and protects our nation more robustly.

    Let’s take this crucial step toward a smarter, safer, and more innovative America. The future of our nation depends on it.

    Visit Department Technology for more information on how a unified Department of Technology can transform our technological future and join the movement to make this vision a reality.

    Agency Budget 2024 Data

    1. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST): The FY 2025 budget request for NIST is approximately $1.498 billion1.
    1. United States Digital Service (USDS): The USDS received a significant boost in funding through the American Rescue Plan, with a $200 million increase2.
    1. Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP): The FY 2024 budget request for OSTP includes $210 billion for federal research and development (R&D), with specific allocations for various initiatives3.
    1. Federal Communications Commission (FCC): The FY 2024 budget request for the FCC is $390.192 million4.
    1. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA): The FY 2024 budget request for CISA is $3 billion5.
    1. General Services Administration (GSA) – Technology Transformation Services (TTS): The TTS received $150 million through the American Rescue Plan for the Federal Citizen Services Fund6.
    1. National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA): The FY 2025 budget request for NTIA is $67 million7.

  • Ballot Initiative Draft: Establishing Elected Department of Technology Governance Positions in California

    Introduction

    This ballot initiative draft seeks to revolutionize California’s technology governance by establishing elected positions dedicated to overseeing technological advancements and cybersecurity. It proposes the creation of state-level Secretary of Technology, county-level Supervisors of Technology, and local Directors of Technology roles. These positions aim to enhance public access to technology services, ensure accountability, and foster innovation.

    By supporting this initiative, Californians can contribute to a more transparent, efficient, and forward-thinking technology infrastructure. The budget for the current California Department of Technology (CDT) for the 2023-2024 fiscal year is approximately $880.4 million with approximately 950 employees.

    Contents

    Title: “Department of Technology Act” – Introduction to the initiative’s name.

    Summary: Overview of the proposed creation of elected technology governance positions to improve technology management in California.

    Section 1: Title – Formal naming of the measure.

    Section 2: Findings and Declarations – Justification for the initiative, highlighting California’s tech leadership and need for dedicated tech governance.

    Section 3: Purpose and Intent – Goals of the measure, including the establishment of Secretary, Supervisors, and Directors of Technology.

    Section 4: Article XXII – Elected Technology Governance Positions

    Section 1: Secretary of Technology – Details on the statewide elected position.

    Section 2: Supervisors of Technology – Information on the county-level positions.

    Section 3: Directors of Technology – Outline of the municipal positions.

    Section 5: Implementation and Transition – Guidelines for implementing and transitioning to the new governance structure.

    Section 6: Severability – Clause ensuring the initiative’s remaining provisions remain effective if parts are invalidated.

    Section 7: Conflicting Measures – Procedure for handling conflicts with other measures.

    Support and Engagement – Steps for public support, including petition circulation, public campaign, and voter education.

    NOTE: The following is a work in progress and rough draft to encourage public debate, feedback, and suggestions.

    Title: California Department of Technology Act

    Summary:
    This initiative proposes the creation of elected positions for a Secretary of Technology at the state level, Supervisors of Technology at the county level, and Directors of Technology at the local level. These positions will enhance technology governance, improve cybersecurity, and ensure public access to advanced technology services. The initiative outlines the roles, responsibilities, and election procedures for these positions to foster transparency, accountability, and innovation in California’s technology landscape.

    SECTION 1. Title
    This measure shall be known and may be cited as the “Department of Technology Act”

    SECTION 2. Findings and Declarations
    (a) California is a global leader in technology and innovation. However, the state must ensure that its governance structures keep pace with technological advancements.
    (b) There is a need for dedicated, accountable leadership to oversee technology policy, enhance cybersecurity, and ensure equitable access to technology services for all Californians.
    (c) Creating elected positions specifically focused on technology will improve public trust, transparency, and efficiency in managing the state’s technological infrastructure and resources.

    SECTION 3. Purpose and Intent
    The purpose of this measure is to:
    (a) Establish the position of Secretary of Technology, elected by the voters of California, to oversee statewide technology policy and initiatives.
    (b) Establish the positions of Supervisors of Technology, elected by the voters in each county, to manage county-level technology projects and coordinate with local and state technology offices.
    (c) Establish the positions of Directors of Technology, elected by the voters in each municipality, to address local technology needs and ensure residents have access to technology resources and services.

    SECTION 4. Article XXII is added to the California Constitution, to read:

    Article XXII. Elected Technology Governance Positions

    Section 1. Secretary of Technology
    (a) There is hereby created the elected office of Secretary of Technology.
    (b) The Secretary of Technology shall be elected by the voters of the state during the general election and shall serve a term of four years.
    (c) The Secretary of Technology shall oversee all statewide technology policies, initiatives, recommendations, and infrastructure, and coordinate with county and local technology offices to ensure consistency and best practices.
    (d) The Secretary of Technology shall have a background in technology.
    (e) County Supervisors of Technology and municipal Directors of Technology reserve the legal right to accept in the entirety, in part, or not, the Secretary of Technology policies, initiatives, and recommendations.

    Section 2. Supervisors of Technology
    (a) There is hereby created the elected office of Supervisor of Technology in each county.
    (b) Each Supervisor of Technology shall be elected by the voters of their respective county during the general election and shall serve a term of four years.
    (c) The Supervisors of Technology shall manage county-level technology projects, enhance cybersecurity, and coordinate with local Directors of Technology and the state Secretary of Technology.
    (d) Each Supervisor of Technology shall have experience in technology implementation and management.

    Section 3. Directors of Technology
    (a) There is hereby created the elected office of Director of Technology in each municipality.
    (b) Each Director of Technology shall be elected by the voters of their respective municipality during the municipal election and shall serve a term of four years.
    (c) The Directors of Technology shall handle local technology needs, support digital education initiatives, and ensure residents have access to technology resources.
    (d) Each Director of Technology shall have expertise in technology and community engagement.

    SECTION 5. Implementation and Transition
    (a) The Legislature shall enact laws to implement this Article, including procedures for the nomination and election of candidates, and the transition of duties to the newly elected officials.
    (b) The first elections for the Secretary of Technology, Supervisors of Technology, and Directors of Technology shall be held in the general election of 2026.

    SECTION 6. Severability
    If any provision of this Act, or part thereof, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, the remaining provisions shall not be affected, but shall remain in full force and effect.

    SECTION 7. Conflicting Measures
    In the event that this measure and another measure or measures relating to the creation of technology governance positions appear on the same statewide ballot, the provisions of the other measures shall be deemed to be in conflict with this measure. In the event that this measure receives a greater number of affirmative votes, the provisions of this measure shall prevail in their entirety, and the provisions of the other measure or measures shall be null and void.

    How to Support Our Initiative:

    1. Petition Circulation: Volunteer or contribute to our petition circulation to gather the required number of signatures from registered voters to qualify the initiative for the ballot.
    2. Public Campaign: Join our public awareness campaign to inform and engage the community about the benefits of this initiative.
    3. Voter Education: Participate in voter education efforts to explain the importance of the elected technology governance positions and encourage voter turnout.

    By establishing these elected positions, California will set a precedent for technology governance, ensuring that the state’s technological advancements are managed with transparency, accountability, and a focus on public benefit.

    Join Us

    The current California Department of Technology (CDT) focuses on IT services and cybersecurity for state agencies. However, our ballot incitive is a groundbreaking proposal for a more transparent and accountable system.

    Imagine a state with elected technology leaders like a Secretary of Technology and local Directors. This new structure ensures public engagement and better oversight.

    Support this initiative for a smarter, safer, and more democratic tech infrastructure.

    Join us in transforming California’s technological future! Support our ballot initiative to establish elected technology governance positions, ensuring greater transparency, accountability, and innovation in our state. Your voice matters—help us create a robust technology infrastructure that serves and protects all Californians. Get involved, spread the word, and vote for a smarter, safer, and more efficient technological future. Together, we can make a difference. Learn more and take action today!

    Additional Infromation

    To qualify a ballot initiative in California, the number of signatures required depends on the type of initiative:

    These numbers are based on a percentage of the votes cast for the governor in the preceding election.

  • Guide to Technology Governance: From Federal to Municipal Levels

    County Level: Supervisor of Technology

    Legislation:

    • County board passes an ordinance to create the position.
    • County executive signs the ordinance into law.

    Candidate Qualification:

    • Set eligibility criteria for candidates.
    • Candidates submit their nominations.

    Campaigning:

    • Candidates campaign county-wide.
    • Public debates and advertisements.

    Election Day:

    • County-wide election held.
    • Voters cast their ballots.

    Vote Counting:

    • Votes are tallied.
    • Results are announced.

    Inauguration:

    • Elected Supervisor of Technology is sworn in.
    • Begins their term in office.

    Municipal Level: Director of Technology

    Legislation:

    • City council passes an ordinance to create the position.
    • Mayor signs the ordinance into law.

    Candidate Qualification:

    • Set eligibility criteria for candidates.
    • Candidates submit their nominations.

    Campaigning:

    • Candidates campaign city-wide.
    • Public debates and advertisements.

    Election Day:

    • City-wide election held.
    • Voters cast their ballots.

    Vote Counting:

    • Votes are tallied.
    • Results are announced.

    Inauguration:

    • Elected Director of Technology is sworn in.
    • Begins their term in office.

    Summary

    The establishment of a Department of Technology, with its structured election and appointment processes, mirrors the organizational frameworks of other federal agencies like the Department of Transportation, Department of Education, and Department of Justice. Each of these departments operates with a combination of federal oversight and localized implementation, ensuring cohesive policy development and execution. This parallel structure ensures that technology governance can be integrated seamlessly, promoting innovation, security, and accountability at all levels of government.

    Federal Level: Secretary of Technology

    Proposal and Legislation:

    • Draft and pass legislation in Congress to create the position.
    • Bill signed into law by the President.

    Nomination:

    • President nominates a candidate for Secretary of Technology.

    Senate Approval:

    • Senate holds confirmation hearings.
    • Senate votes to confirm or reject the nominee.

    Appointment:

    • If confirmed, the nominee is appointed as Secretary of Technology.
    • Official swearing-in ceremony.

    State Level: Secretary of Technology

    Legislation:

    • State legislature passes a bill to create the position.
    • Governor signs the bill into law.

    Candidate Qualification: Set eligibility criteria for candidates such as being a registered resident and voter of the state.

    • Candidates submit their nominations.

    Campaigning:

    • Candidates campaign statewide.
    • Public debates and advertisements.

    Election Day:

    • Statewide election held.
    • Voters cast their ballots.

    Vote Counting:

    • Votes are tallied.
    • Results are announced.

    Inauguration:

    • Elected Secretary of Technology is sworn in.
    • Begins their term in office.

    County Level: Supervisor of Technology

    Legislation:

    • County board passes an ordinance to create the position.
    • County executive signs the ordinance into law.

    Candidate Qualification:

    • Set eligibility criteria for candidates.
    • Candidates submit their nominations.

    Campaigning:

    • Candidates campaign county-wide.
    • Public debates and advertisements.

    Election Day:

    • County-wide election held.
    • Voters cast their ballots.

    Vote Counting:

    • Votes are tallied.
    • Results are announced.

    Inauguration:

    • Elected Supervisor of Technology is sworn in.
    • Begins their term in office.

    Municipal Level: Director of Technology

    Legislation:

    • City council passes an ordinance to create the position.
    • Mayor signs the ordinance into law.

    Candidate Qualification:

    • Set eligibility criteria for candidates.
    • Candidates submit their nominations.

    Campaigning:

    • Candidates campaign city-wide.
    • Public debates and advertisements.

    Election Day:

    • City-wide election held.
    • Voters cast their ballots.

    Vote Counting:

    • Votes are tallied.
    • Results are announced.

    Inauguration:

    • Elected Director of Technology is sworn in.
    • Begins their term in office.

    Summary

    The establishment of a Department of Technology, with its structured election and appointment processes, mirrors the organizational frameworks of other federal agencies like the Department of Transportation, Department of Education, and Department of Justice. Each of these departments operates with a combination of federal oversight and localized implementation, ensuring cohesive policy development and execution. This parallel structure ensures that technology governance can be integrated seamlessly, promoting innovation, security, and accountability at all levels of government.

    Explore our introductory guide to technology governance from federal to municipal levels. Learn about the nomination, election, and appointment processes for positions such as the Secretary of Technology, Supervisor of Technology, and Director of Technology. Understand how these roles ensure specialized and accountable leadership to drive effective tech policies and enhance transparent, innovative governance.

    Federal Level: Secretary of Technology

    Proposal and Legislation:

    • Draft and pass legislation in Congress to create the position.
    • Bill signed into law by the President.

    Nomination:

    • President nominates a candidate for Secretary of Technology.

    Senate Approval:

    • Senate holds confirmation hearings.
    • Senate votes to confirm or reject the nominee.

    Appointment:

    • If confirmed, the nominee is appointed as Secretary of Technology.
    • Official swearing-in ceremony.

    State Level: Secretary of Technology

    Legislation:

    • State legislature passes a bill to create the position.
    • Governor signs the bill into law.

    Candidate Qualification: Set eligibility criteria for candidates such as being a registered resident and voter of the state.

    • Candidates submit their nominations.

    Campaigning:

    • Candidates campaign statewide.
    • Public debates and advertisements.

    Election Day:

    • Statewide election held.
    • Voters cast their ballots.

    Vote Counting:

    • Votes are tallied.
    • Results are announced.

    Inauguration:

    • Elected Secretary of Technology is sworn in.
    • Begins their term in office.

    County Level: Supervisor of Technology

    Legislation:

    • County board passes an ordinance to create the position.
    • County executive signs the ordinance into law.

    Candidate Qualification:

    • Set eligibility criteria for candidates.
    • Candidates submit their nominations.

    Campaigning:

    • Candidates campaign county-wide.
    • Public debates and advertisements.

    Election Day:

    • County-wide election held.
    • Voters cast their ballots.

    Vote Counting:

    • Votes are tallied.
    • Results are announced.

    Inauguration:

    • Elected Supervisor of Technology is sworn in.
    • Begins their term in office.

    Municipal Level: Director of Technology

    Legislation:

    • City council passes an ordinance to create the position.
    • Mayor signs the ordinance into law.

    Candidate Qualification:

    • Set eligibility criteria for candidates.
    • Candidates submit their nominations.

    Campaigning:

    • Candidates campaign city-wide.
    • Public debates and advertisements.

    Election Day:

    • City-wide election held.
    • Voters cast their ballots.

    Vote Counting:

    • Votes are tallied.
    • Results are announced.

    Inauguration:

    • Elected Director of Technology is sworn in.
    • Begins their term in office.

    Summary

    The establishment of a Department of Technology, with its structured election and appointment processes, mirrors the organizational frameworks of other federal agencies like the Department of Transportation, Department of Education, and Department of Justice. Each of these departments operates with a combination of federal oversight and localized implementation, ensuring cohesive policy development and execution. This parallel structure ensures that technology governance can be integrated seamlessly, promoting innovation, security, and accountability at all levels of government.

    Explore our introductory guide to technology governance from federal to municipal levels. Learn about the nomination, election, and appointment processes for positions such as the Secretary of Technology, Supervisor of Technology, and Director of Technology. Understand how these roles ensure specialized and accountable leadership to drive effective tech policies and enhance transparent, innovative governance.

    Federal Level: Secretary of Technology

    Proposal and Legislation:

    • Draft and pass legislation in Congress to create the position.
    • Bill signed into law by the President.

    Nomination:

    • President nominates a candidate for Secretary of Technology.

    Senate Approval:

    • Senate holds confirmation hearings.
    • Senate votes to confirm or reject the nominee.

    Appointment:

    • If confirmed, the nominee is appointed as Secretary of Technology.
    • Official swearing-in ceremony.

    State Level: Secretary of Technology

    Legislation:

    • State legislature passes a bill to create the position.
    • Governor signs the bill into law.

    Candidate Qualification: Set eligibility criteria for candidates such as being a registered resident and voter of the state.

    • Candidates submit their nominations.

    Campaigning:

    • Candidates campaign statewide.
    • Public debates and advertisements.

    Election Day:

    • Statewide election held.
    • Voters cast their ballots.

    Vote Counting:

    • Votes are tallied.
    • Results are announced.

    Inauguration:

    • Elected Secretary of Technology is sworn in.
    • Begins their term in office.

    County Level: Supervisor of Technology

    Legislation:

    • County board passes an ordinance to create the position.
    • County executive signs the ordinance into law.

    Candidate Qualification:

    • Set eligibility criteria for candidates.
    • Candidates submit their nominations.

    Campaigning:

    • Candidates campaign county-wide.
    • Public debates and advertisements.

    Election Day:

    • County-wide election held.
    • Voters cast their ballots.

    Vote Counting:

    • Votes are tallied.
    • Results are announced.

    Inauguration:

    • Elected Supervisor of Technology is sworn in.
    • Begins their term in office.

    Municipal Level: Director of Technology

    Legislation:

    • City council passes an ordinance to create the position.
    • Mayor signs the ordinance into law.

    Candidate Qualification:

    • Set eligibility criteria for candidates.
    • Candidates submit their nominations.

    Campaigning:

    • Candidates campaign city-wide.
    • Public debates and advertisements.

    Election Day:

    • City-wide election held.
    • Voters cast their ballots.

    Vote Counting:

    • Votes are tallied.
    • Results are announced.

    Inauguration:

    • Elected Director of Technology is sworn in.
    • Begins their term in office.

    Summary

    The establishment of a Department of Technology, with its structured election and appointment processes, mirrors the organizational frameworks of other federal agencies like the Department of Transportation, Department of Education, and Department of Justice. Each of these departments operates with a combination of federal oversight and localized implementation, ensuring cohesive policy development and execution. This parallel structure ensures that technology governance can be integrated seamlessly, promoting innovation, security, and accountability at all levels of government.

  • Why a Future Department of Technology Surpasses the California Department of Technology

    In an era where technology is the backbone of progress and efficiency, the concept of a dedicated Department of Technology at various government levels is not just innovative but imperative. While our California Department of Technology (CDT) has tried to manage the state’s technology infrastructure, our proposed future Department of Technology (DoT), as envisioned at www.department.technology, offers a superior vision that promises enhanced benefits for voters, taxpayers, and businesses. Here’s why:

    Genuine Accountability and Transparency

    Individuals appointed by bureaucrats and career politicians lead the California Department of Technology (CDT), often resulting in a lack of genuine accountability and transparency. Self-serving interests can influence their leadership, potentially conflicting with the public good.

    Future Department of Technology (DoT) would have its officials elected directly by voters, ensuring they are accountable to the public. The election-based leadership model guarantees that the Future Department of Technology (DoT) is transparent, accessible, and truly representative of voters’ interests, fostering greater public trust and ensuring efficient and effective use of taxpayer money.

    Broader Scope and Vision

    CDT attempt to control the technology needs of the state government, managing projects, policies, and cybersecurity within California. Its scope is limited to state-level initiatives.

    DoT aims for a more comprehensive approach, advocating for the establishment of technology departments at the municipal, county, state, and federal levels. This broad scope ensures a unified and strategic application of technology across all layers of government, leading to more cohesive and efficient public services.

    Economic Competitiveness

    CDT primarily focuses on the internal technological needs of the California government, and does not directly focus on boosting the state’s economic competitiveness on a broader scale.

    DoT ensures that the California economy remains at the forefront of global technological advancements. By encouraging new ideas and investing in advanced technology systems, the Department of Transportation (DoT) would help create a more competitive business environment. This would attract investments and lead to job growth in the technology sector.

    Focus on Privacy and Security

    CDT has tried to enhance cybersecurity within California’s government framework. However, the challenges of data privacy and security are ever-evolving.

    DoT would place a stronger emphasis on personal privacy and societal safety on a national scale. By developing robust policies and frameworks that prioritize data protection and cybersecurity, the DoT would safeguard citizens’ information more effectively against increasingly sophisticated cyber threats.

    Environmental Sustainability

    CDT does not have a dedicated focus on integrating technology with environmental sustainability.

    DoT envisions a future where technology and sustainability go hand-in-hand. By promoting environmentally friendly technologies and sustainable practices, the DoT would contribute to the development of a greener and more sustainable future. This includes advancing smart city initiatives, renewable energy technologies, and sustainable infrastructure projects.

    Agility and Innovation

    CDT operates within the constraints of state governance, which can sometimes stifle innovation because of bureaucratic red tape and special interests.

    DoT advocates for a more agile and innovative approach to governance. The Department of Transportation (DoT) can stay up to date with the latest technology by quickly adopting new technologies and encouraging a culture of constant improvement. This will ensure that government operations always benefit from the latest technological advancements.

    In Summary

    While the California Department of Technology has attempted to make important contributions to the state’s technological landscape, the vision of a future Department of Technology offers a more ambitious, comprehensive, and forward-thinking approach. By integrating technology more deeply and strategically across all levels of government, the DoT promises to deliver superior benefits to voters, taxpayers, and businesses, ensuring a more transparent, efficient, and competitive future.

    For more insights, see our chart below, and to join the advocacy for a future Department of Technology, visit Department of Technology.

    A side-by-side comparison of the challenges faced by the California Department of Technology (CDT) and how the Department of Technology (DoT) approach could address these issues, with examples from CDT:

    Issue California Department of Technology (CDT) Department of Technology (DoT) Approach
    Frequent Reorganization The CDT has undergone several name and structural changes, such as the transition from the California Technology Agency (CTA) to the Department of Technology (DoT) under Governor Brown. This constant rebranding disrupts continuity. Minimize Frequent Reorganizations: For instance, CDT could have avoided the 2013 rebranding from CTA to DoT by maintaining a stable structure. A consistent framework would provide stability and reduce confusion.
    Resource Drain Each reorganization, like the shift in 2009 when the Office of Information Security was moved into the newly created CTA, consumes resources that could be used for core activities. Streamline Resource Allocation: CDT should allocate more resources to critical projects, such as the development of secure IT infrastructure, instead of spending on transitions and rebranding.
    Loss of Institutional Knowledge Frequent leadership changes, such as those following the reorganization in 2009, often result in the loss of experienced personnel and institutional knowledge. Ensure Leadership Continuity: By retaining experienced leaders during and after organizational changes, CDT can maintain valuable expertise and continuity. For example, maintaining consistent leadership during the 2013 transition could have preserved institutional knowledge.
    Public Perception and Trust Frequent structural changes and rebranding may lead to a perception of instability, potentially eroding public trust. For example, the frequent changes in the department’s name might confuse stakeholders and diminish confidence in the department’s stability. Enhance Stakeholder Engagement: CDT could improve public perception by regularly communicating its goals and progress. This could involve clear updates and engagement efforts during transitions, such as through public briefings and transparency reports.
    Disruption of Continuity Each reorganization, such as the 2009 integration of various offices into CTA, can cause disruptions and delays in project execution. For example, the reorganization might have slowed down critical IT projects or policy implementations. Establish a Clear Strategic Vision: Developing and sticking to a long-term strategic plan would help CDT provide continuity. For instance, maintaining a consistent strategic vision during transitions would prevent disruptions in ongoing projects.
    Inefficiency in Operations The diversion of resources to manage transitions, like the overhaul from DTS to CTA, can lead to inefficiencies and delays in core functions. Optimize Resource Management: CDT should focus resources on key projects, such as enhancing cybersecurity measures, and reduce efforts spent on managing changes. Efficient resource allocation would ensure better performance in core activities.
    Need for Improvement Challenges in integrating new technologies and improving processes can arise from constant changes, such as adapting to new IT tools amidst structural reorganizations. Promote Continuous Improvement: CDT should regularly assess its practices and integrate new technologies systematically. For example, implementing regular reviews and updates to technology infrastructure would enhance effectiveness despite organizational changes.
    Lack of Technological Integration Frequent restructuring can hinder the adoption of modern technologies. For example, the constant rebranding may have delayed the implementation of advanced IT solutions. Leverage Technology and Best Practices: CDT should adopt advanced technologies and benchmark against industry standards. For example, following best practices in IT infrastructure development and investing in cutting-edge solutions could improve technological integration.

  • Navigating Legal Challenges for a Potential Department of Technology

    The establishment of a dedicated Department of Technology at municipal, county, state, and federal levels presents an exciting opportunity to integrate advanced technology into governance. However, such a significant shift also comes with potential legal challenges that must be addressed to ensure its successful implementation. This post explores these potential legal hurdles and the strategies to overcome them.

    Constitutional Considerations

    The first legal challenge involves the constitutional considerations of creating a new government department. At the federal level, the establishment of a Department of Technology would require congressional approval and possibly amendments to existing statutes. This process involves a careful examination of the Constitution to ensure that the new department’s powers and functions do not infringe on the responsibilities of other branches of government or violate states’ rights.

    Legislative Framework

    Creating a Department of Technology would require comprehensive legislation outlining its structure, functions, and powers. This legislation would need to address various issues, such as the department’s jurisdiction, its relationship with other government agencies, and the scope of its authority. Drafting such legislation involves balancing the need for robust technological integration with the preservation of existing legal and regulatory frameworks.

    Data Privacy and Security

    One of the primary roles of the Department of Technology would be to protect personal privacy and ensure cybersecurity. This responsibility involves navigating a complex web of existing data protection laws and regulations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) for international data handling and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) at the state level. Ensuring compliance with these laws while implementing new data protection standards could present significant legal challenges.

    Intellectual Property Rights

    The Department of Technology would likely oversee and support technological innovation, which raises issues related to intellectual property (IP) rights. Ensuring that new technologies and innovations developed or supported by the department are adequately protected under IP laws is crucial. This involves addressing potential conflicts between federal and state IP regulations and ensuring that the department’s activities do not infringe on existing IP rights.

    Employment and Labor Laws

    The creation of a new department would necessitate hiring a significant number of employees, ranging from technologists to administrative staff. Ensuring compliance with employment and labor laws, including equal employment opportunity regulations and labor union agreements, is essential. Additionally, establishing clear policies for hiring, training, and managing these employees will be crucial to avoid potential legal disputes.

    Environmental Regulations

    A key objective of the Department of Technology is to develop environmentally friendly technology infrastructure. This objective must align with existing environmental regulations, such as the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and various state-level environmental protection laws. Ensuring that new technologies and infrastructure projects comply with these regulations will be critical to avoiding legal challenges related to environmental impact.

    Federal-State Relations

    The establishment of a Department of Technology at multiple levels of government raises potential legal issues concerning federal-state relations. Ensuring that the department’s activities do not encroach on state sovereignty or conflict with state laws is crucial. This involves navigating the complex interplay between federal preemption and states’ rights, particularly in areas where technology policy and regulation overlap.

    Legal Recourse and Accountability

    Finally, establishing clear mechanisms for legal recourse and accountability within the Department of Technology is essential. This includes defining the department’s liability in case of legal disputes, setting up procedures for handling complaints and grievances, and ensuring transparency in its operations. Implementing robust oversight mechanisms, such as independent review boards or ombudsman offices, can help address potential legal challenges and maintain public trust.

    Final Words

    While the creation of a dedicated Department of Technology offers numerous benefits, it also presents significant legal challenges that must be carefully navigated. By addressing constitutional considerations, developing a comprehensive legislative framework, ensuring compliance with data privacy and security laws, protecting intellectual property rights, adhering to employment and labor laws, complying with environmental regulations, managing federal-state relations, and establishing clear mechanisms for legal recourse and accountability, we can overcome these challenges and pave the way for a more technologically integrated and efficient government.

    As we advocate for this transformative initiative, it is crucial to engage with legal experts, policymakers, and stakeholders to ensure that the Department of Technology is built on a solid legal foundation. Together, we can create a future where technology enhances governance, drives innovation, and benefits society as a whole.

  • Our Roadmap to a future Department of Technology

    Overview of the Department of Technology

    A Department of Technology can be established at federal, state, county, and municipal levels to address the diverse needs of technology management, policy, and innovation. The structure includes dedicated roles for emerging fields such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and robotics, ensuring specialized oversight and development. Here’s a breakdown of how this department might be organized at each level of government:

    Federal Level

    • Secretary of Technology: The top official responsible for overall strategy and direction. A cabinet level position, appointed by the US President and confirmed by the US Senate.
    • Deputy Secretary: Assists the Secretary and oversees specific offices.
      • Office of Policy and Planning: Develops technology policies and strategic plans.
      • Office of Privacy and Security: Manages data privacy and cybersecurity.
      • Office of Technology Innovation:
      • AI Division: Focuses on AI research, development, and policy.
      • Robotics Division: Handles robotics research and policy.
      • Emerging Technologies Division: Looks into other new tech innovations.
      • Office of Environmental Sustainability: Ensures technology projects are environmentally friendly.
      • Office of Public Affairs: Manages communication and public relations.
    • Assistant Secretaries: Each focuses on a specific area, including AI and robotics, to ensure detailed attention to these advanced technologies.
    • Regional Offices: Implement federal policies locally and coordinate AI and robotics initiatives.

    State Level

    • Secretary of State Department of Technology: Oversees the state’s technology strategies and operations. A state-wide office elected by the voters of the state.
    • Deputy Secretary: Supports the Secretary and manages different offices.
      • Office of State Technology Policy: Develops and implements state-level tech policies.
      • Office of Data Privacy and Security: Manages privacy and security at the state level.
      • Office of Technology Development:
      • AI Division: Specializes in state-level AI projects and policies.
      • Robotics Division: Focuses on state-level robotics initiatives.
      • Office of Environmental Technology: Ensures technology is sustainable and eco-friendly.
      • Office of Public Relations: Handles media relations and public engagement.
    • Assistant Secretaries: Each covers key areas, including AI and robotics, to ensure effective management and development.
    • Regional Offices: Coordinate state technology policies and AI/robotics projects locally.

    County Level

    • County Director of Technology: Leads the county’s technology efforts. A county-wide office elected the voters with the county.
    • Deputy Director: Assists with managing various functions.
      • Office of County Technology Planning: Plans and analyzes county tech needs.
      • Office of Information Privacy: Focuses on data protection at the county level.
      • Office of Technology Projects:
      • AI and Robotics Division: Manages AI and robotics projects within the county.
      • Office of Environmental Technology: Ensures county tech projects are environmentally sustainable.
      • Office of Community Outreach: Engages with the community and communicates technology initiatives.
    • Assistant Directors: Each focuses on specific areas like AI and robotics to ensure effective management.
    • Local Offices: Implement county technology policies and support AI/robotics projects in the community.

    Municipal Level

    • City Technology Director: Manages the city’s technology programs and services. A city-wide office elected by the voters within the city.
    • Deputy Director: Supports the Director and oversees specific areas.
      • Office of Municipal Technology Strategy: Develops strategies and policies for city tech.
      • Office of Data Protection: Handles data privacy and security for the city.
      • Office of Technology Services:
      • AI and Robotics Division: Oversees AI and robotics services and support in the city.
      • Office of Green Technology: Focuses on sustainable technology practices.
      • Office of Public Information: Manages communications and public relations.
    • Assistant Directors: Each covers a specific area, including AI and robotics, to ensure focused management.
    • Neighborhood Technology Liaisons: Work directly with neighborhoods to implement tech solutions and support.

    Abbreviated Roadmap

    Federal Level

    1. Secretary of Technology
    • Deputy Secretary of Technology
      • Office of Policy and Planning
      • Policy Analysts
      • Strategic Planners
      • Office of Privacy and Security
      • Chief Privacy Officer
      • Chief Information Security Officer
      • Office of Technology Innovation
      • AI Division
        • AI Research and Development Specialists
        • AI Policy Advisors
      • Robotics Division
        • Robotics Research and Development Engineers
        • Robotics Policy Advisors
      • Emerging Technologies Division
      • Office of Environmental Sustainability
      • Environmental Impact Analysts
      • Sustainable Technology Advisors
      • Office of Public Affairs
      • Communications Specialists
      • Public Relations Officers
    1. Assistant Secretaries
    • Assistant Secretary for Policy
    • Assistant Secretary for Privacy
    • Assistant Secretary for AI and Robotics
    • Assistant Secretary for Innovation
    • Assistant Secretary for Sustainability
    • Assistant Secretary for Communications
    1. Regional Offices
    • Regional Director
    • Regional Policy Advisors
    • Regional Security Analysts
    • Regional AI and Robotics Coordinators

    State Level

    1. Secretary of State Department of Technology
    • Deputy Secretary of State Department of Technology
      • Office of State Technology Policy
      • Policy Analysts
      • Legislative Liaison
      • Office of Data Privacy and Security
      • Chief Data Privacy Officer
      • State Security Analysts
      • Office of Technology Development
      • AI Division
        • AI Specialists
        • AI Policy Experts
      • Robotics Division
        • Robotics Engineers
        • Robotics Policy Experts
      • Tech R&D Teams
      • Office of Environmental Technology
      • Sustainability Coordinators
      • Environmental Compliance Officers
      • Office of Public Relations
      • Media Relations Specialists
      • Community Engagement Coordinators
    1. Assistant Secretaries
    • Assistant Secretary for Policy
    • Assistant Secretary for Privacy
    • Assistant Secretary for AI and Robotics
    • Assistant Secretary for Technology Development
    • Assistant Secretary for Environmental Technology
    • Assistant Secretary for Public Relations
    1. Regional Offices
    • Regional Director
    • Regional Policy Advisors
    • Regional Security Analysts
    • Regional AI and Robotics Specialists

    County Level

    1. County Director of Technology
    • Deputy County Director of Technology
      • Office of County Technology Planning
      • Planning and Analysis Team
      • Local Policy Advisors
      • Office of Information Privacy
      • County Privacy Officer
      • Local Security Team
      • Office of Technology Projects
      • AI and Robotics Division
        • AI Project Managers
        • Robotics Project Managers
      • Project Managers
      • Technical Specialists
      • Office of Environmental Technology
      • Sustainability Advisors
      • Environmental Compliance Staff
      • Office of Community Outreach
      • Outreach Coordinators
      • Public Information Officers
    1. Assistant Directors
    • Assistant Director for Planning
    • Assistant Director for Privacy
    • Assistant Director for AI and Robotics Projects
    • Assistant Director for Environmental Technology
    • Assistant Director for Outreach
    1. Local Offices
    • Local Technology Coordinator
    • Local Policy Advisors
    • Local Privacy and Security Staff
    • Local AI and Robotics Specialists

    Municipal Level

    1. City Technology Director
    • Deputy City Technology Director
      • Office of Municipal Technology Strategy
      • Strategy Analysts
      • Local Policy Experts
      • Office of Data Protection
      • City Data Protection Officer
      • Local Security Personnel
      • Office of Technology Services
      • AI and Robotics Division
        • AI Service Managers
        • Robotics Service Managers
      • IT Service Managers
      • Tech Support Teams
      • Office of Green Technology
      • Green Tech Advisors
      • Environmental Impact Assessors
      • Office of Public Information
      • Communications Managers
      • Public Engagement Specialists
    1. Assistant Directors
    • Assistant Director for Strategy
    • Assistant Director for Data Protection
    • Assistant Director for AI and Robotics
    • Assistant Director for Green Technology
    • Assistant Director for Public Information
    1. Neighborhood Technology Liaisons
    • Neighborhood Tech Liaison Coordinators
    • Local Tech Support Teams
    • Community Technology Advisors