The Elected Official AI Disclosure Act would require simple transparency when artificial intelligence helps shape policy—because democracy depends on knowing who (or what) is writing the rules.
The Silent Revolution in Government
Across America, a quiet transformation is happening in government offices. City council members are using AI to draft zoning ordinances. Congressional staffers are feeding constituent concerns into algorithms to generate policy responses. State legislators are using artificial intelligence to analyze bills and write amendments. County supervisors are employing AI tools to craft budget proposals.
This isn’t necessarily wrong—AI can help elected officials process vast amounts of information, identify overlooked issues, and even improve the clarity of legal language. The problem is that voters have no idea when their representatives are using artificial intelligence to help govern them.
Democracy’s most fundamental promise is that citizens can hold their representatives accountable for their decisions. But how can voters evaluate their elected officials’ judgment when they don’t know whether a policy proposal came from human reasoning, algorithmic analysis, or some combination of both?
It’s time for Congress to pass the Elected Official AI Disclosure Act—a straightforward federal law requiring elected officials at every level of government to disclose when artificial intelligence contributed to policy proposals, legislation, or regulations.
The Transparency Crisis We Didn’t See Coming
Traditional government transparency laws were designed for an era when policy documents came from human minds, research staffs, and committee deliberations. These laws require disclosure of meetings, votes, and financial interests, but they say nothing about algorithmic assistance in policymaking.
This creates a dangerous blind spot in democratic accountability. When an AI system helps draft a healthcare policy, voters can’t evaluate whether the proposal reflects human judgment about community needs or algorithmic processing of data that might contain biases or limitations. When artificial intelligence assists in writing criminal justice reforms, constituents deserve to know so they can assess whether the policy addresses real-world complexities that only human experience might understand.
The issue isn’t whether AI assistance is good or bad—it’s whether voters have the information they need to evaluate their representatives’ decision-making processes. Democracy requires informed choice, and informed choice requires transparency about how policies are actually developed.
Consider the implications: If an AI system trained on data from wealthy districts helps a city council member draft affordable housing policies, voters should know that context. If a congressional representative uses AI trained primarily on federal law to draft local business regulations, constituents deserve that information when evaluating the policy’s appropriateness.
A Simple Solution: One Sentence Changes Everything
The Elected Official AI Disclosure Act would require nothing more than radical transparency through radical simplicity. The proposed law would mandate that any elected official at any level of government—from city council to Congress—include a single disclosure sentence when AI contributes to policy proposals, legislation, or regulations.
The disclosure would be straightforward: “Artificial intelligence was used to assist in developing this proposal.”
That’s it. No complex technical explanations. No detailed algorithmic audits. Just one clear sentence that lets voters know when AI played a role in shaping policy that affects their lives.
This approach respects both democratic values and practical governance needs. Elected officials could still benefit from AI tools that help them serve constituents more effectively, while voters would have the essential information needed to hold their representatives accountable.
The disclosure requirement would apply across all levels of government:
Federal Level: Congressional representatives and senators would disclose AI assistance in bills, amendments, and policy proposals.
State Level: Governors, state legislators, and agency heads would disclose AI use in state laws, regulations, and executive orders.
County Level: County commissioners, supervisors, and executives would disclose AI assistance in local ordinances and county policies.
Municipal Level: City council members, mayors, and local officials would disclose AI use in city regulations and local governance decisions.
Why This Matters for American Democracy
The stakes extend far beyond government efficiency. When voters don’t know whether their representatives are using AI assistance, several democratic principles come under threat.
Accountability becomes impossible. If a policy fails or causes harm, voters need to understand whether the failure stemmed from poor human judgment, flawed algorithmic analysis, or inadequate integration of AI insights with human wisdom. Without disclosure, citizens can’t properly evaluate their representatives’ decision-making capabilities.
Bias goes undetected. AI systems reflect the biases present in their training data. If an elected official uses AI trained primarily on policies from similar communities, the resulting proposals might not address the unique needs of their specific constituency. Voters deserve to know when algorithmic bias might influence policies affecting their lives.
Democratic debate gets distorted. When constituents engage with their representatives about policy proposals, they deserve to know whether they’re debating human reasoning, algorithmic outputs, or hybrid recommendations. The nature of AI involvement affects how citizens should frame their concerns and suggestions.
Trust erodes through secrecy. Democracy depends on trust between representatives and constituents. When voters discover that their elected officials have been using AI without disclosure, it damages the fundamental trust that makes democratic governance possible.
Learning from Academic and Corporate Standards
The Elected Official AI Disclosure Act would bring government in line with transparency standards already emerging in other sectors. Academic journals increasingly require disclosure when AI assists in research or writing. Major news organizations are developing policies for AI disclosure in journalism. Even social media platforms are experimenting with AI content labeling.
Government should lead in transparency, not lag behind private sector standards. If journalists must disclose AI assistance in news articles that inform public opinion, surely elected officials should disclose AI assistance in policies that govern public life.
The corporate world offers instructive parallels as well. Companies using AI in hiring, lending, or healthcare face increasing pressure for algorithmic transparency. If private businesses must disclose AI use in decisions affecting individual opportunities, democratic governments should certainly disclose AI use in decisions affecting entire communities.
Addressing Practical Concerns
Critics might argue that disclosure requirements could discourage beneficial AI use or create bureaucratic burdens. The Elected Official AI Disclosure Act addresses these concerns through its elegant simplicity.
No bureaucratic complexity: The requirement involves adding a single sentence, not filing complex reports or conducting technical audits. This minimal burden preserves government efficiency while ensuring democratic transparency.
No prohibition on AI use: The law doesn’t restrict how elected officials use AI tools—it simply requires disclosure. Representatives remain free to use artificial intelligence in whatever ways help them serve constituents better.
No technical expertise required: Officials don’t need to understand machine learning algorithms or explain technical details. They simply need to know whether AI assisted their work and include a standardized disclosure sentence.
No partisan implications: The requirement applies equally to all elected officials regardless of party affiliation, ideology, or level of government. This is about democratic transparency, not political advantage.
The Bipartisan Case for AI Disclosure
Transparency in government should unite Americans across political divides. Conservatives should support the Elected Official AI Disclosure Act because it promotes accountability and prevents government from operating in shadows. Progressives should support it because it protects against algorithmic bias and ensures democratic participation in the AI age.
Good government advocates should embrace AI disclosure because it strengthens democratic institutions for the technological future. Taxpayers should support it because they deserve to know how their elected representatives develop policies affecting their communities.
Technology enthusiasts should back the law because it enables beneficial AI use while maintaining public trust. Privacy advocates should champion it because it provides essential information about how AI might affect policy decisions impacting civil liberties.
The beauty of this approach is that it doesn’t require taking sides about whether AI assistance in government is good or bad. Instead, it simply ensures that voters have the information they need to make their own judgments about their representatives’ use of technological tools.
Building Trust Through Transparency
The Elected Official AI Disclosure Act represents a crucial step toward ensuring that American democracy can adapt to the AI age while preserving its core values. By requiring simple, clear disclosure when artificial intelligence assists in policymaking, the law would restore the transparency that democracy requires.
This isn’t about stopping progress or fearing technology. It’s about ensuring that technological progress serves democratic values rather than undermining them. When elected officials use AI tools to better serve their constituents, voters should celebrate that efficiency. When AI assistance produces flawed or biased policies, voters should be able to hold their representatives accountable.
The choice before Congress is straightforward: Will American democracy lead the world in showing how AI can enhance democratic governance through transparency? Or will we allow the integration of AI into government to happen in shadows, eroding the trust that makes self-governance possible?
Democracy’s strength has always come from informed citizens making informed choices about their representatives. In the AI age, that requires knowing when artificial intelligence helps shape the policies that govern our lives. One sentence of disclosure isn’t too much to ask for the preservation of democratic accountability.
The Elected Official AI Disclosure Act offers a simple solution to a complex challenge: preserving democracy’s transparency in the age of artificial intelligence, one disclosure at a time.
Contact your representatives and urge them to support the Elected Official AI Disclosure Act. Democracy works best when it works in the open—even in the age of AI.
AI Disclosure Act: Example Sentences for Government Officials
Sample disclosure language for elected officials using AI assistance in policy development
Standard Disclosure Sentences
Basic Required Disclosure
“Artificial intelligence was used to assist in developing this proposal.”
Alternative Standard Formats
- “This proposal was developed with artificial intelligence assistance.”
- “AI tools were used to help prepare this legislation.”
- “Artificial intelligence assisted in the creation of this policy.”
- “This document was prepared with the assistance of AI technology.”
Federal Level Examples
Congressional Bill Introduction
Senator’s Floor Statement: “Mr. President, I rise today to introduce the Rural Broadband Infrastructure Act. This comprehensive legislation addresses the digital divide affecting millions of Americans in rural communities. Artificial intelligence was used to assist in developing this proposal. The bill establishes…”
House Committee Report: “The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure presents this report on H.R. 2847, the National Bridge Safety Act. After extensive hearings and stakeholder input, we recommend passage of this vital infrastructure legislation. Artificial intelligence was used to assist in developing this proposal.”
Federal Agency Regulation
Department of Agriculture Proposed Rule: “The Department proposes amendments to organic certification standards to address emerging agricultural technologies. This proposal was developed with artificial intelligence assistance. Public comment period begins…”
State Level Examples
Governor’s Policy Announcement
Press Release: “Today I am announcing the California Climate Resilience Initiative, a comprehensive plan to prepare our state for the challenges of climate change. This initiative includes $2 billion in new investments and reforms to 15 state agencies. AI tools were used to help prepare this legislation.”
State Legislative Committee
Committee Report on Education Funding: “The House Education Committee has completed its review of the proposed K-12 funding formula. After months of analysis and public hearings, we present these recommendations for improving educational equity statewide. Artificial intelligence assisted in the creation of this policy.”
State Agency Rulemaking
Department of Health Regulation: “The Department hereby proposes new regulations for telehealth services to improve access to medical care in underserved areas. This document was prepared with the assistance of AI technology. The proposed rules would…”
County Level Examples
County Commissioner Meeting
Budget Proposal Presentation: “Commissioners, I present the proposed FY 2026 county budget, which balances fiscal responsibility with essential services for our residents. This $340 million budget addresses infrastructure, public safety, and social services. Artificial intelligence was used to assist in developing this proposal.”
County Planning Commission
Zoning Amendment Report: “The Planning Commission recommends approval of the proposed mixed-use development ordinance for the downtown district. This recommendation follows extensive community input and technical analysis. This proposal was developed with artificial intelligence assistance.”
County Health Department
Public Health Policy: “The County Health Department announces new guidelines for restaurant inspections and food safety protocols. These updated procedures reflect current best practices and community health needs. AI tools were used to help prepare this legislation.”
Municipal Level Examples
City Council Meeting
Mayor’s State of the City Address: “Fellow residents, our city continues to grow and prosper. Tonight, I present five major initiatives for the coming year: affordable housing expansion, downtown revitalization, transportation improvements, environmental sustainability, and public safety enhancements. Artificial intelligence assisted in the creation of this policy.”
Council Member Motion: “I move to approve the proposed amendments to our parking ordinance, which will create more accessible spaces downtown while supporting local businesses. This document was prepared with the assistance of AI technology.”
City Planning Department
Development Guidelines: “The Planning Department presents revised guidelines for affordable housing developments, incorporating community feedback and current best practices. These guidelines aim to increase housing availability while preserving neighborhood character. Artificial intelligence was used to assist in developing this proposal.”
Municipal Utility Commission
Rate Structure Proposal: “The Utility Commission proposes modifications to our tiered rate structure to promote water conservation while ensuring system sustainability. This proposal balances environmental stewardship with affordability for all residents. This proposal was developed with artificial intelligence assistance.”
School Board Examples
Curriculum Policy
School Board Resolution: “The Board of Education adopts this comprehensive digital literacy curriculum for grades K-12, preparing our students for success in an increasingly technological world. AI tools were used to help prepare this legislation.”
Budget Presentation
Superintendent’s Budget Proposal: “This proposed budget prioritizes student achievement, teacher retention, and facility improvements while maintaining fiscal responsibility. Artificial intelligence assisted in the creation of this policy.”
Special District Examples
Transit Authority
Service Expansion Plan: “The Regional Transit Authority announces expanded bus service to underserved neighborhoods, improving access to employment and essential services. This document was prepared with the assistance of AI technology.”
Water District
Conservation Policy: “In response to ongoing drought conditions, the Water District implements Stage 2 conservation measures while investing in long-term supply reliability. Artificial intelligence was used to assist in developing this proposal.”
Context-Specific Variations
When AI Assisted with Research
“Artificial intelligence was used to assist in research and analysis for this proposal.”
When AI Helped with Legal Language
“AI tools assisted in drafting the legal language for this ordinance.”
When AI Analyzed Public Input
“Artificial intelligence helped analyze public comments in developing this policy.”
When AI Assisted Multiple Aspects
“This legislation was developed with artificial intelligence assistance in research, analysis, and drafting.”
Department of Technology 
Leave a comment